Not sure what to say without offending anyone..! So I guess we all can agree to disagree..!
But Kima It did cross my mind that yes she answered the question but she didn't detail it, if angus, Monica or Stanton had anything to do with it and it was Gideon's idea that Nathan needed to be killed then technically " he did kill him" he would be just as guilty as the person that actually killed Nathan because planning and knowing about a murder before hand makes you no better than that person..!
So why would it make a difference if he actually did it or him having a hand in knowing or help planning it..!? He would still be a murderer the LAWS eyes..!! ( I'm Just Saying..!!)